Search:

Motto: "Women building a better society."

Find us on Facebook

 

 


Alerts

 

MP Stephen Woodworth Motion M-312 on Abortion May 2nd 2012

 MP Stephen Woodworth (Kitchener Centre) proposed in Motion M-312 that Parliament study when human life begins, by reviewing Section 223 of the Criminal Code, which provides the child becomes a human being once he or she is fully proceeded in a living state from the body of its mother. 

 Protest Rally RE:Bill 13 (Ontario) March 28th 2012

The protest rally held on March 29, 2012 is to protect parents’ rights in education which have been overruled by Bill 13, pursuant to which children are to be forced by law to study a curriculum which normalizes homosexuality and raises questions for the children as to their gender.

 Who is running the country: the courts or the government?  November 2nd 2011

The decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on the Vancouver drug injection site, known as Insite, has established troubling precedents by which the court has maximized its power, and conversely, diminished the power of Parliament.

In effect, the Supreme Court of Canada in the Insite case, has thrown down the gauntlet, and announced that it, rather than the government, will in future direct the nation's affairs. 

  Judges ill positioned to make public policy decisions

 The  announcement by two of the judges on the Supreme Court Of Canada of their  proposed retirement, provides an opportunity to ensure that the newly appointed  judges to the Supreme Court respect the role of Parliament to allow it to make  public policy decisions, rather than the judges assuming this role themselves. 

  Ontario Government Equity Policy

  The Ontario government has provided an “Equity and Inclusive Education Policy (EIE)” which it requires all publicly funded school boards, both public and Catholic, to implement.


  


Media Release

 

 

1. Canadians need the protection of the Notwithstanding Clause. March 27th. 2012

The decision yesterday by the Ontario Court of Appeal to legalize brothels, contrary to prostitution law passed by Parliament, indicates that the time has come to apply the Notwithstanding Clause (S.33) of the Charter, to protect Canadians from judges legislating from the bench.

 2. Prostitution Decision by Ontario Court of Appeal March 26th 2012

 REAL Women of Canada is disappointed that the Ontario Court of Appeal, which is the most liberal court in Canada, has ignored the views of Parliament in this case.

This Court partially upheld the lower court’s decision of Madam Justice Susan Himel to allow prostitutes to operate from legal brothels

 3. Supreme Court of Canada Refuses Exemption from   Religious Classes Feb. 20th

The hope that the religious rights of parents in education would be definitively settled floundered in the recent decision by the Supreme Court of Canada in S.L. and D.J. (Appellants) – and- The Commission scolaire des Chenes and Attorney General of Quebec. This was due to the fact that the Court found that Quebec’s 2008 Mandatory Ethics and Religious Culture program (ECR) which replaced Catholic and Protestant programs of religion and moral instruction in Quebec’s schools, did not infringe the parents’ freedom of religion or interfere with the parents’ ability to pass their faith on to their children.

4. Lancet letter exposes serious errors in Vancouver Injection Room study. Jan. 18th

5. Discrimination against females by way of gender based abortions. Jan. 17th.

 



 

Publications
Find all our latest publications here
Please check out our latest analysis
"Role of Judges"


 

Current Initiatives
For more information, go to Initiatives.

Please watch for our next initiative.


 

REALity
Check the latest issue of our news publication: March. - April. 2012

 

REALity March April 2012
 

 EVENTS

 REAL Women of Canada

Annual General Meeting

May 7, 2012 7:00 PM

Cartier Place Suite Hotel

180 Cooper St Ottawa ON

---------------------------------

WORLD CONGRESS OF FAMILIES VI

Madrid, Spain  

  The 6th World Congress of Families will be held in Madrid on May 25 - 27, 2012 at the Palacio De Congresos De Madrid.   

 The program includes many of the serious problems facing families today including:

 -          the sexual revolution;

-          culture of life and culture of death;

-          homosexual lobby;

-          freedom of religion;

-          the media;

-          rights of parents in education

 Plan to attend this amazing Congress. Speakers will include pro-family and pro-life leaders, scholars, politicians and activists from around the world. 

 For registration go to:  www.congresosmundial.es/en/.


 

Carol's Corner

“Carol’s Corner” seems to be a popular feature of our web site and we’ve had many enquiries about her identity. In fact, “Carol” is a composite Real Woman! Her column has been written by a number of contributors. “She” will continue to weigh in on all kinds of matters of interest to both our members and those who visit our site. Happy reading!

The anti-bullying issue has, once again, become front and centre. On December 2, 2011, both Chris Selley and Kelly McParland, of the National Post, wrote columns about this issue: both fall far short of the mark.

 Selley’s main concern seems to be that gay students be protected. However, the school boards are so gay-friendly that gays, like other, favoured, usually “multicultural” groups, can get away with practically any kind of behaviour. People walk on eggshells to be as politically correct as possible so as not to offend students, teachers, or administrators in these groups. (In his testimony, one of the Shafia children, in the honour killing trial, has just admitted to this favouritism.)

Could it be that some bullying is a result of sheer frustration on the part of the “ordinary” student, who sees that certain students are favoured? How unfair! It would seem that Christians are disrespected all the time. Muslim prayers in schools? No problem. Promotion of the highly sexualized gay agenda? No problem again. Gaia worship? A-OK. Name Christmas? No way. The opinions of Christians are unwelcome and those who have the audacity to voice their objections are marginalized and stigmatized as bigots. So, Christians, in general, have learned to keep their heads down and their mouths shut. Speaking of bullying, Selley might think about THAT!

 There’s a HUGE double standard. E.g., A mega-BULLY, an openly gay activist Toronto teacher, who helped write the gay curriculum, who ran for the NDP, and is now trying to silence/punish SUN News by dictating terms re what/how they’re allowed to express opinions—or else—is considered a member in good standing of his board. What if another teacher weighed in to challenge his despicable agenda and bully behaviour? That teacher would be disciplined—probably re-education sessions—and become an outcast, shunned and punished by that same board.

 Christian teachers (and students) and those who appreciate the Judeo-Christian dispensation of the West are altogether marginalized. They tend to  just get on with their difficult jobs. Administrators are joined at the hip to the “progressive” agenda and altogether ignore that teachers and students, not included in the favoured groups, are on their own—and expected to put up with it. The PC gulags, that are our public systems—hey, they mirror our “Me First” culture— MODEL bullying: then they wonder what’s gone wrong.

 McParland likes the idea of expulsion. That’s going to work like a lead balloon! Spooked by the spectre of litigation—a critical mass of the parents of bullies are like rabid pit bulls—administrators are terrified to actually USE the Education Act sanctions at their disposal. Expulsion has always been available. Year by year—and, of course, “punishment” is frowned upon—serious consequences for anti-social behaviour in our schools has virtually disappeared. The kids who often need it the most are often members of the protected groups. Whoops, ’can’t go there! The paper work for expelling a student is also daunting and parents can appeal: that can be a long, drawn out, expensive, nasty process. Administrators are quite likely to give expulsion a wide berth.

 And, what’s to happen to the expelled students: the thugs and anti-social misfits? “Boot” (reform) schools to deal with these bullies, who need some pretty stiff consequences, seem to be a good idea. But can one imagine that happening? The Charter would be invoked and boot schools would probably be deemed unacceptable.

 A crucial aspect of the bullying issue, entirely ignored by both Selley and McParland is, “What about the parents?” All teachers note that a critical mass of the student body is increasingly arriving at school with no manners at all: too many kids are totally self-referential and out for number one. The schools are trying to teach generosity, empathy, respect, etc.—most schools promote “The Value of the Month”—to little avail: as someone once said, “Cosmetics on a corpse.” The whole, politically correct system is a petri dish for favouritism, intolerance, and punishment of those who don’t toe the line. The kids know this in their bones: lack of respect for true openness, diversity, tolerance, and fairness is all around them.

 Unless the whole system—our secular, materialistic culture—makes some pretty radical changes, like tossing overboard the whole totalitarian, PC agenda, bullying will continue to proliferate. As C. S. Lewis wrote—in a book about education!—“In a sort of ghastly simplicity we remove the organ and demand the function. We make men without chests and expect of them virtue and enterprise. We laugh at honour and are shocked to find traitors in our midst. We castrate and then bid the geldings to be fruitful.”