Search:

Motto: "Women building a better society."

Find us on Facebook

 


Alerts


 Who is running the country: the courts or the government?

 November 2nd 2011

The decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on the Vancouver drug injection site, known as Insite, has established troubling precedents by which the court has maximized its power, and conversely, diminished the power of Parliament.

In effect, the Supreme Court of Canada in the Insite case, has thrown down the gauntlet, and announced that it, rather than the government, will in future direct the nation's affairs. 

 Judges ill positioned to make public policy decisions

 The  announcement by two of the judges on the Supreme Court Of Canada of their  proposed retirement, provides an opportunity to ensure that the newly appointed  judges to the Supreme Court respect the role of Parliament to allow it to make  public policy decisions, rather than the judges assuming this role themselves. 

 Ontario Government Equity Policy

 The Ontario government has provided an “Equity and Inclusive Education Policy (EIE)” which it requires all publicly funded school boards, both public and Catholic, to implement.
 

 Bill C-510 – Roxanne’s Law Bill to protect pregnant women from being coerced into having an abortion

 Last April, Conservative MP Mr. Rod Bruinooge (Winnipeg South), introduced Bill C-510 (Roxanne’s Law).  The purpose of the bill is to protect pregnant women who want to bring their unborn children safely to term, free from coercion to abort. 

 Transgender Bill C-389 Proceeds to Third Reading and Debate

The controversial Bill C-389 protecting Gender Identity and Gender Expression in the Canadian Human Rights Act i.e. to protect the transgendered and transsexuals, was fast tracked through the House of Commons.  There was only one objection to the bill at second reading on June 10, 2010.  The bill was then...

 


Media Release


1. Lancet letter exposes serious errors in Vancouver Injection Room study. Jan. 18th

2. Discrimination against females by way of gender based abortions. Jan. 17th.

 3. B.C. Court Decision on Polygamy Nov. 23rd 2011

4. Time for the notwithstanding clause. Nov. 7th  2011

5. A Drug Addict's Destiny Oct. 3rd 2011

6. Supreme Court of Canada decides Canada's National Policy on Drugs RE: Vancouver Drug Injection Site. Sept. 30th 2011

7. Erroneous Study on Vancouver Injection Site Exposed. Sept. 22nd 2011
Three Australian doctors, a Canadian Ph.D., and Dr. Robert Dupont, the President of the US National Institute of Drug Abuse (NIDA), are part of an international team, which has exposed major, inexcusable errors in a highly influential 2011 Lancet study on Vancouver’s Insite injecting facility.  

 



Publications
Find all our latest publications here
Please check out our latest analysis "Role of Judges"


Current Initiatives
For more information, go to Initiatives.
Please watch for our next initiative.


REALity
Check the latest issue of our news publication: Nov. - Dec. 2011

 

REALity Nov Dec  2011
 

 Events

WORLD CONGRESS OF FAMILIES VI

Madrid, Spain  

  The 6th World Congress of Families will be held in Madrid on May 25 - 27, 2012 at the Palacio De Congresos De Madrid.   

 The program includes many of the serious problems facing families today including:

 -          the sexual revolution;

-          culture of life and culture of death;

-          homosexual lobby;

-          freedom of religion;

-          the media;

-          rights of parents in education

 Plan to attend this amazing Congress. Speakers will include pro-family and pro-life leaders, scholars, politicians and activists from around the world. 

 For registration go to:  www.congresosmundial.es/en/.


 

Carol's Corner

“Carol’s Corner” seems to be a popular feature of our web site and we’ve had many enquiries about her identity. In fact, “Carol” is a composite Real Woman! Her column has been written by a number of contributors. “She” will continue to weigh in on all kinds of matters of interest to both our members and those who visit our site. Happy reading!

The anti-bullying issue has, once again, become front and centre. On December 2, 2011, both Chris Selley and Kelly McParland, of the National Post, wrote columns about this issue: both fall far short of the mark.

 Selley’s main concern seems to be that gay students be protected. However, the school boards are so gay-friendly that gays, like other, favoured, usually “multicultural” groups, can get away with practically any kind of behaviour. People walk on eggshells to be as politically correct as possible so as not to offend students, teachers, or administrators in these groups. (In his testimony, one of the Shafia children, in the honour killing trial, has just admitted to this favouritism.)

Could it be that some bullying is a result of sheer frustration on the part of the “ordinary” student, who sees that certain students are favoured? How unfair! It would seem that Christians are disrespected all the time. Muslim prayers in schools? No problem. Promotion of the highly sexualized gay agenda? No problem again. Gaia worship? A-OK. Name Christmas? No way. The opinions of Christians are unwelcome and those who have the audacity to voice their objections are marginalized and stigmatized as bigots. So, Christians, in general, have learned to keep their heads down and their mouths shut. Speaking of bullying, Selley might think about THAT!

 There’s a HUGE double standard. E.g., A mega-BULLY, an openly gay activist Toronto teacher, who helped write the gay curriculum, who ran for the NDP, and is now trying to silence/punish SUN News by dictating terms re what/how they’re allowed to express opinions—or else—is considered a member in good standing of his board. What if another teacher weighed in to challenge his despicable agenda and bully behaviour? That teacher would be disciplined—probably re-education sessions—and become an outcast, shunned and punished by that same board.

 Christian teachers (and students) and those who appreciate the Judeo-Christian dispensation of the West are altogether marginalized. They tend to  just get on with their difficult jobs. Administrators are joined at the hip to the “progressive” agenda and altogether ignore that teachers and students, not included in the favoured groups, are on their own—and expected to put up with it. The PC gulags, that are our public systems—hey, they mirror our “Me First” culture— MODEL bullying: then they wonder what’s gone wrong.

 McParland likes the idea of expulsion. That’s going to work like a lead balloon! Spooked by the spectre of litigation—a critical mass of the parents of bullies are like rabid pit bulls—administrators are terrified to actually USE the Education Act sanctions at their disposal. Expulsion has always been available. Year by year—and, of course, “punishment” is frowned upon—serious consequences for anti-social behaviour in our schools has virtually disappeared. The kids who often need it the most are often members of the protected groups. Whoops, ’can’t go there! The paper work for expelling a student is also daunting and parents can appeal: that can be a long, drawn out, expensive, nasty process. Administrators are quite likely to give expulsion a wide berth.

 And, what’s to happen to the expelled students: the thugs and anti-social misfits? “Boot” (reform) schools to deal with these bullies, who need some pretty stiff consequences, seem to be a good idea. But can one imagine that happening? The Charter would be invoked and boot schools would probably be deemed unacceptable.

 A crucial aspect of the bullying issue, entirely ignored by both Selley and McParland is, “What about the parents?” All teachers note that a critical mass of the student body is increasingly arriving at school with no manners at all: too many kids are totally self-referential and out for number one. The schools are trying to teach generosity, empathy, respect, etc.—most schools promote “The Value of the Month”—to little avail: as someone once said, “Cosmetics on a corpse.” The whole, politically correct system is a petri dish for favouritism, intolerance, and punishment of those who don’t toe the line. The kids know this in their bones: lack of respect for true openness, diversity, tolerance, and fairness is all around them.

 Unless the whole system—our secular, materialistic culture—makes some pretty radical changes, like tossing overboard the whole totalitarian, PC agenda, bullying will continue to proliferate. As C. S. Lewis wrote—in a book about education!—“In a sort of ghastly simplicity we remove the organ and demand the function. We make men without chests and expect of them virtue and enterprise. We laugh at honour and are shocked to find traitors in our midst. We castrate and then bid the geldings to be fruitful.”