BACK TO TABLE OF CONTENTS
CANADA'S
TROUBLING DIVORCE LAWS
Although Statistics
Canada reports that 75.7% of children under 11 years of age live
in a two-parent family with their biological parents, there are
still far too many children experiencing serious problems due to
the break-up of their parents' marriage.
No less than
69,088 couples divorced in 1998, breaking a ten-year trend in declining
divorce rates by an increase in the divorce rate of 2.5%. It is
hoped that this rise is only a one-time anomaly rather than the
beginning of an upward trend, as clearly a high divorce rate has
serious implications for society and especially, for children. Divorce
may end the marriage and is a conclusion of the adult relationship,
but for children, it is frequently the beginning of a serious disruption
of their lives. The 1970's view that divorce is no big deal for
children and that they will bounce back, just has not proven to
be true.
In September 2000, a groundbreaking US study showed that divorce
has lasting and permanent effects on the children. Dr. Judith Wallerstein
of the University of California at Berkeley carried out this study.
In this study, Dr. Wallerstein found that, surprisingly, children
of divorce were most likely to be seriously affected by family break-up
when in their 20s and 30s when they experience difficulty in forming
intimate and lasting relationships of their own. In short, divorce
has a "sleeper effect" on children that crops up after
they are grown.
However, for
those who are obliged to separate because of abuse, drugs and alcoholism,
etc., it is not all gloomy as there are still actions that can be
taken to protect their children. According to Dr. Wallerstein such
parents should:
1. Stay strong.
Child[ren] should be assured that they are not suddenly responsible
for their parents' emotional well-being.
2. Provide continuity for the children, maintaining their usual
schedule of activities. Try to keep them in the same playgroup,
the same milieu, among familiar faces and accustomed scenes.
3. Never let your own search for new love preoccupy you at the
children's expense.
One of the
problems facing children where their mothers have custody may be
the lack of a father's influence and input on a constant basis in
their upbringing.
According
to Dr. Kyle Pruett, a clinical professor of psychiatry at the Yale
University Child Study Centre, fathers are vitally important to
their children's lives. He points out in his book Fatherhood: Why
Father Care is as essential as Mother Care for your Child (Free
Press, New York, 2000), that both parents contribute to the healthy
development of their children - differing most often in their disciplinary
approach. Mothers generally emphasize the social and relational
costs of misbehavior, whereas fathers tend to bluntly emphasize
the practical consequences. Also, when parents split up, in Canada,
in 87% of cases, children under 12 years remain with their mothers,
while only 7% live with their fathers and 6% live in joint custody
arrangements. The lack of a father's constant input in the raising
of children by separated parents may well be one of the explanations
for why such children often do less well on nearly every scale:
A high rate of school drop-out, substance abuse, depression, early
unwed pregnancies, etc., are cited as occurring far more frequently
in single-parent families.
Moreover, most divorced women must also contend with serious financial
woes. Statistics Canada's first-ever study, released in April 1997,
on the financial impact of separation and divorce on families with
children, found that one year after separating, women's after-tax
income decreased by 23% in contrast to men's incomes which shot
up 10% after separation or divorce. The reason for the economic
woes of women is due to the fact that, on average, they earn less
than men and, of course, in the vast majority of cases (87%), due
to their having custody of the children, they are frequently limited
in their availability for work.
Moreover, this financial squeeze for women seems to continue, even
into old age. According to an interdisciplinary group study on aging
carried out at the University of Western Ontario in London, Ontario,
under the direction of Statistics Canada, released this year, it
was shown that divorce interferes with the effectiveness of the
informal family support network for women in their later years.
In effect, the marriage break-up decreases the financial support
women receive from their children later in life. Conversely, it
also decreases the financial help a parent is able or willing to
give an adult child. In short, divorce damages both the inter-family
financial network as well as the emotional one.
Canada's
Divorce Law
In view of
the problems that arise from divorce, why are so many divorces taking
place in Canada? The answer may well lie with our divorce laws.
Prior to 1968,
the only ground for divorce was adultery. However, in 1968, the
Divorce Act was amended to permit divorce for other reasons, including
adultery, physical and mental cruelty and separation for at least
3 years. In 1986, the Divorce Act was further amended to permit
divorce after one year's separation, with no requirement to prove
"fault" by either spouse. This amendment led to an astronomical
increase in the rate of divorce in Canada.
This no-fault
divorce law was the inspiration of feminists who argued at that
time that no-fault divorces would lead to a decrease in animosity,
trauma and expense in divorce actions. How wrong this has proved
to be! The only ones who have benefited from no-fault divorce are
lawyers and accountants! Custody and finances are still the key
sources of trouble in ending a marriage and the no-fault concept
has done nothing to resolve these issues.
This no-fault
choice has not only made it all too easy for spouses to walk away
from a marriage, instead of trying to work through the stresses
inevitable in every marriage, but has also, unfortunately emphasized
personal happiness in marriage as a priority over responsibilities
to spouse and children.
What Can
Be Done?
Easy divorce
undermines the stability of marriage and the family. Significantly,
there is no convincing data in families where marital conflicts
exist, that the children are more adversely affected by this conflict
than by a separation or divorce.
It seems imperative,
therefore, that our divorce law should be tightened. If marriages
are more difficult to dissolve, then perhaps spouses will take their
responsibilities to marriage more seriously. Further changes should
include:
·
Mandatory marriage preparation courses at school and church levels;
· A network of support systems for ailing marriages should
be set up, including easily available and low-cost counselling.
These services should be tax-deductible and government subsidized
so as to be available to all families, regardless of their economic
status.
BACK TO TABLE OF CONTENTS
|