BACK TO TABLE OF CONTENTS

THE BROCKIE CASE - Statement by the Evangelical Fellowship of Canada

A newly-formed legal intervention alliance, known as The Canadian Religious Freedom Alliance (made up of The Evangelical Fellowship of Canada and The Catholic Civil Rights League), has been granted intervenor status in the Brockie case.

On February 24, 2000, a Board of Inquiry under the Ontario Human Rights Code found that the rights of Ray Brillinger and the Canadian Lesbian and Gay Archives (of which Mr. Brillinger was current vice president) had been infringed by Scott Brockie when he refused to provide them with a printing service. Mr. Brockie testified that "he endeavours to live his life according to biblical principles" and that "providing printing services to lesbian and gay organizations was in direct opposition to his beliefs."

The Board found that Brockie discriminated against the complainants on the ground of sexual orientation for which Brockie was ordered to pay damages in the amount of $5,000.00, notwithstanding acceptance by the Board that Brockie's beliefs were sincerely held. The Board went on to say that "it is reasonable to limit Brockie's freedom of religion in order to prevent the very real harm to members of the lesbian and gay community..." and that "Brockie remains free to hold his religious belief and practice them in his home and in his Christian community".

The application for intervention by the Canadian Religious Freedom Alliance was successfully argued before the Ontario Divisional Court on May 23. The appeal is tentatively scheduled for hearing on November 29 and 30. Represented by CLF member, David M. Brown of Stikeman Elliott, the Alliance will argue among other things that:

"The freedom of conscience and religion guaranteed by section 2 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms includes the freedom to refuse to provide services to a cause or activity to which an individual objects on bona fide conscientious or religious grounds. The obligations imposed by section 1 of the Ontario Human Rights Code (the "Code") must be read in light of such a constitutional freedom; and

If left undisturbed, the decision of the Board of Inquiry would eliminate, for all intents and purposes, the practical ability of any person who provides services to the public to refuse to service a cause or activity to which he or she objects on bona fide conscientious or religious grounds..."



The Evangelical Fellowship of Canada believes this case has significant implications for our profession and all those who choose to act out their faith in mainstream society. Jesus used images such as salt, light, leaven and seeds to describe His kingdom's effect on the world. His gospel is intended to transform not only persons but also institutions and the value structures that undergird society. Jesus has sent us into the world to have influence. Jesus not only affects one's private life but one's public life as well.

To limit a Christian's beliefs as the Board did above to be practiced "in his home and in his Christian community" is to deny the principle that underpins the gospel message, "Go into all the world and preach the gospel to every creature" (Mark 16:15; excerpts from The Word in Life Study Bible).

Comment by REAL Women:

Until this contentious issue is settled, Christians continue to be at risk, when living out their faith in the public square.

BACK TO TABLE OF CONTENTS