BACK TO TABLE OF CONTENTS

Human Rights Commisions Have To Go

Bewitched, bothered, and bewildered, and downright dangerous aptly describe our federal and provincial Human Rights Commissions. The fact is that they are insane asylums run by the inmates, the Commissioners and Managers, who have apparently put even their employees' teeth on edge - at least in regard to the federal Commission.

Recently, an internal report studying the federal Commission indicated that 63% of its staff have quit in the last two years, and that 37% of its employees have stated that they also intend to quit because of a infighting, mistrust, crisis management, managers travel expenses, sexual discrimination, favouritism, etc.

The federal Commission, which costs the taxpayers $22 million each year to operate with its 250 employees, paid out $100,000 between 1998 and early 2000 for the Chief Commissioner, Michelle Falardeau-Ramsay, to travel abroad, plus $6,000 for her hospitality expenses between 1998 and 1999. In fact, Ms. Falardeau-Ramsay was away advising authorities in Indonesia on the problems in East Timor, when the story about her internal problems broke. Ms. Falardeau-Ramsay hustled back to Canada to hold a press conference to explain how strong her leadership was and that, although her Commission was recently experiencing some rough waves, everything was now under control. The Globe and Mail, wrung its hands and piously stated in its editorial on May 16, 2001:

… It is tragic that an organization devoted to protecting workers' rights has managed to so alienate and frustrate its own staff. The commission has a valuable role to play in protecting Canada's workers, but staff are being distracted from this mandate. The internal strife is leaving too many victims waiting too long for assistance and justice.

Hopefully, the troubles at the Commission will continue to distract its employees for a long time so that it cannot find the time and energy to cause more damage to the lives and pocketbooks of its innocent victims by way of its social engineering antics. (See reprint of article dated May 17, 2001, by Globe and Mail columnist, Margaret Wente, page 17).

BACK TO TABLE OF CONTENTS