|
BACK TO TABLE OF CONTENTS
HOMOSEXUALS BATTLE FOR OUR CHILDREN'S MINDS
Unable to scale
the adult world of resistance, homosexual activists have now focused
their strategy on influencing our children. It is true that homosexual
activists have gained some control of the instruments of power in
Canada, such as the Human Rights Commissions and the courts, but
even armed with these weapons, they have been unable to win over
the hearts and minds of many individual Canadians. Some may be intimidated
by these agents of power and reluctant to speak out publicly on
the issue, but, nonetheless, in general, the public has not accepted
many of the objectives of the homosexual activists.
This wall
of resistance braced against the social and legal acceptance of
the homosexual agenda has remained impenetrable, despite the best
efforts of the secular media, which serve as a propaganda tool for
the homosexual cause.
To breach this rampart, the activists have developed a very real
and dangerous strategy. Unable to influence a majority of the adult
population, instead, they will reach into the impressionable minds
of our children by infiltrating the school system with their propaganda.
This effort by homosexual activists amounts to the waging of a cultural
war on our children's sexual health and moral fiber. Make no mistake.
The lines have been drawn.
Framing
the Debate
The key to
the activists achieving success within the school system is for
them to gain control of the debate by framing it on their own terms.
They assert that the issue is all about "child safety"
and the creation of "safe" schools to increase tolerance
and sensitivity to gay students and, at the elementary school level,
to teach tolerance for students whose parents are homosexual. The
pro-family forces, on the other hand, frame the debate on their
terms, which is to oppose the forcing of a gay agenda on children
in schools.
Homosexual
"Safety" Issues
The homosexual
campaign to enter our schools with their propaganda relies mainly
on a claim that homosexual youth make up 30% of all youth suicides.
The activists seize upon the claim that "homophobia" has
created a climate in schools where violence, name-calling and health
problems lead to the suicide of homosexual youths. Consequently,
students must be taught "tolerance" for others, including
homosexual "victims." This argument automatically puts
pro-family forces and, and if they don't comply, school boards,
on the defensive and makes them appear uncaring and intolerant of
the suffering of homosexual students.
The truth
is, however, that there is no statistically significant relationship
between homosexuality and suicide.
(a) In a 1994
article in the New England Journal of Medicine, Friedman and Downey
state:
Three
psychological postmortem studies conducted in different areas
of the United States have not demonstrated an increased frequency
of people identified as homosexual among those who committed suicide.
(b) A 1995
study, which compared 120 of 170 consecutive suicides under age
twenty and 147 community, age, sex and ethnic matched controls living
in the greater New York area, found that there was not a significantly
higher rate of homosexual experience among teen suicides than among
the controls;
This article
stated:
We found
no evidence that the risk factors among gays were any different
than those among straight teenagers.
The debate
that links homosexuality to suicide may be a distracting side-issue
to two real problems; a) some gay teenagers experience significant
adjustment difficulties that require precise study and appropriate
intervention, and b) suicide is most common in individuals with
a psychiatric illness, rather than in individuals with a "hard
life."
Teen Suicide
Rate in Canada
In Canada,
it is significant that the suicide rate among youths in Quebec (which
was the first province to include sexual orientation in its human
rights legislation in 1977) is higher than that in Alberta, for
example, which amended its human rights legislation (as ordered
by the Supreme Court of Canada in the Vriend case) a year or so
ago.
According
to statistics published by Health Canada in "Suicide in
Canada, Update of the Report of the Task Force on Suicide in Canada"
(1994), Quebec's youth suicide rates rose dramatically between
1977 and 1992. By contrast, Alberta's youth suicide rates slightly
decreased in that period.
Further, it
is significant that, according to Statistics Canada, Quebec teens
have the highest suicide rate in the western world. In 1950, the
teen suicide rate in Quebec stood at just two per 100,000 population,
about the same as the national rate. Then in 1970, it started rising
inexplicably each year, reaching 20 per 100,000 today. By comparison,
the teen suicide rate in Ontario is 12 per 100,000 and the national
rate is 10 per 100,000. Only Saskatchewan shares a similarly high
rate now, at about 20 per 100,000. While unable to explain the increase
in Quebec, psychiatrists do not attribute it in any way to so-called
"anti-gay" sentiments in our schools.
The Campaign
in the Schools
Once the activists have framed the debate in terms of tolerance
and safety of the students, they carry out their campaign in the
schools using several techniques:
- Set up
student support groups or clubs for homosexual students known
as "Gay-Straight Alliances."
- Call for the establishment of "Gay and Lesbian History
Month."
- Hold training seminars for school staff on how to "help"
homosexual students and promote homosexual-affirming "diversity"
in the classroom and school. This includes inviting homosexual
activists into the classrooms to teach children "tolerance"
and "diversity."
- Make pro-homosexual changes in the curricula.
Pro-homosexual changes in the curricula include replacing standard
vocabulary in the family life program, such as "husband,
wife, spouse," and "marriage," with generic terms,
such as "partner, companion, couple, relationships."
School sex education programs, in turn, focus on gay-friendly
concepts about "safe sex" and AIDS education. This takes
the emphasis away from support for abstinence and traditional
marriage models, while emphasizing support for tolerance of a
permissive, sexually promiscuous lifestyle.
School Libraries
Homosexual
activists are making it a priority to make donations to school libraries.
They target libraries in order to have them carry titles which actually
celebrate the homosexual lifestyle. It is important that we check
out our school libraries and raise strenuous objections if we find
such propaganda material there.
School Boards
Some school
boards have decided to ban unsuitable books, which promote homosexuality
as a lifestyle choice. Such decisions are now being challenged in
the courts by homosexual activists. For example, the Surrey, BC,
School Board decision, which excluded certain pro-homosexual books
in kindergarten and grade 1, is currently on appeal to the Supreme
Court of Canada. (See Reality, September/October 2000, "Religious
Views Recognized," p. 1.) The time to appeal the unanimous
decision of the BC Court of Appeal, which confirmed that school
boards can properly exercise their jurisdiction and refuse controversial
books, expired 6 months previously. However, the unabashedly homosexual
advocate on the Supreme Court of Canada, Madame Justice Claire L'Heureux
Dubé (See Reality, "Speeches by Judge Create Controversy,"
March/April 2000, p. 16), granted an extension of time to allow
an appeal of this case to the Supreme Court of Canada. This appeal
is expected to be heard sometime in the fall of 2002. Fortunately,
a coalition of faith groups, the Evangelical Fellowship of Canada
(EFC), the Catholic Archdiocese of Vancouver, the Catholic Civil
Rights League and the Canadian Alliance for Social Justice and Family
Values Association, have been granted intervener status in the case.
This coalition
will be arguing that the exclusion of religion from the public school
system infringes on religious freedom. It will also argue that parents
have a right to participate in school board decisions regarding
appropriate classroom materials.
Promotion
of the Homosexual Agenda
Some examples
of homosexual activists promoting their agenda in Canadian schools
are as follows:
Ontario
The public
Toronto District School Board has introduced a pro-homosexual agenda
in its system. (See Reality, "Homosexual Indoctrination
in Toronto schools," November/December, 2000, p. 18.) Also,
the Peel District School Board (Caledon, Brampton, Mississauga),
has adopted a homosexual program in its schools. The Elementary
Teachers' Federation of Ontario, representing 65,000 elementary
school teachers, voted at its annual meeting in August (500 delegates
were present) to lobby all Ontario school boards to set aside funds
to "reflect lesbian, gay, and transgender realities."
According to the union's president, Phyllis Benedict, the union
is "trying to promote a more positive environment in schools."
According
to an article appearing in the homosexual newspaper, Xtra,
(January 10, 2002) pro-homosexual workshops called "The Human
Sexuality Program," are now available to all Toronto public
school students - the bulk of them being primary and junior school
students. At the beginning of the school year, information on the
workshops is sent to each of the schools in the Toronto School District
Board, then teachers, principals or students may telephone to organize
a workshop at their school.
There are
six people who work in the Toronto board's Equity Department which
enforces its so-called "anti-homosexual" equity policy
in the board's 600 schools. In the end, however, it is up to the
teachers or the schools to decide whether this issue will be addressed.
However, according to one of the Equity Department members, many
teachers and administrators are nervous about the program. She also
said that the Equity Department frequently field calls from principals
and teachers who want to know how to deal with parents who object
to the "anti-homophobia" advocates in their children's
schools. Good for those parents!
Saskatchewan
Last September,
a Committee of the Saskatoon Public School Board recommended pro-homosexual
curriculum changes, mandatory staff training and the introduction
of library material to promote homosexuality in its school system.
What Must
Be Done
It is important
to understand that each board has the right to determine which books
will be used in the classrooms. Moreover, the courts have made it
clear that it is the parents who have the final say over the material
to which their children are exposed - not the teachers or their
union. Do not be intimidated by teachers or boards who attempt to
dismiss your concerns and isolate you by saying, "You're the
only parent who has complained." Don't believe it! Further,
it is important to know what your school's policy is concerning
students' questions about homosexuality. Does the school board notify
parents that the topic has arisen? Does it recommend that students
consult homosexual organizations? Does it request a homosexual teacher
or counselor to 'reach out" (indoctrinate) a vulnerable, confused
student to make him/her feel "comfortable?" What is the
official position of the guidance department on these issues?
According
to the article in Xtra (referred to above), homosexuals providing
these controversial workshops say the anxiety in doing this work
is palpable because, "It takes one parent to complain to make
the school really nervous about doing this work again." Making
our views known is definitely worthwhile!
It is necessary
for each one of us to do our part to stop this battle for our children's
minds by a massive intrusion into our school systems. We can do
this by contacting not only our local schools, but also our school
boards to determine what their policies are on homosexual programs
in the schools. We must resist with all our might the introduction
of such dangerous programs.
If public
education continues resisting the public moral will, while basic
skills diminish even further, the ultimate solution may be voter
rejection of the public schools and a student exodus to private
schools and home schooling - a trend that has already begun.
We cannot,
however, abandon the system without a fierce battle for what is
right. We are, in conscience, obligated to protect children from
forces of decadence, such as homosexual indoctrination in our school
system.
The public
school system belongs to us and it must not be overtaken by extremists
intent on forcing their own agendas on our children.
BACK TO TABLE OF CONTENTS
|