BACK TO TABLE OF CONTENTS

TAXPAYERS FUND SAME-SEX MARRIAGE COURT CHALLENGES

The notorious federally-funded Court Challenges Program has generously provided monies to the homosexual lobby group EGALE in its court interventions in support of same-sex marriages in the provinces of Quebec, Ontario and BC.

As if this were not enough abuse of taxpayers' money, Mr. Justice Harry LaForme of the Ontario Divisional Court (recently re-named the Ontario Superior Court of Justice), who wrote the majority decision in that case in support of same-sex marriages, was apparently of the opinion that the homosexual activists challenging traditional marriage should be financially rewarded by the taxpayer for their efforts.

It is not widely known that at the end of his judgment, Mr. Justice LaForme ordered the Department of Justice to pay the legal costs, on a "partial indemnity" basis, of the eight homosexual/lesbian couples who launched the Court challenge. Customarily, this would amount to awarding approximately two thirds of their costs for the week-long hearing. This order may result in the federal government being required to pay anywhere from several hundred thousand dollars to as much as $1 million in legal costs and expenses to the homosexual activists.

The shrieks of outrage by the homosexual activists and their lawyers when Minister of Justice Cauchon announced he would appeal the case on July 29, 2002, was certainly due in part to the fact that they could see all this money flying out the window. John Fisher, Executive Director of EGALE, complained, "This announcement [of the appeal] means that these costly and time-consuming proceedings must continue." (See Capital Xtra, August 2, 2002.) The same-sex couples themselves complained vociferously that the protracted legal battle will cost the federal government possibly tens of millions of dollars and years to settle, if the case goes to the Supreme Court of Canada. It would not be cynical to assume it is not the taxpayers the litigants are worried about! Rather, it is the possibility that they might lose some, if not all, of their newly-found wealth should a higher court decides against Mr. Justice LaForme's order for costs.

To avoid just such a calamity, on August 26, 2002, the same-sex couples filed leave to cross-appeal on the federal government's appeal, demanding that the federal government be required to pay their substantial legal costs on the appeal. That is, they demanded in their application that, if the Court grants the Attorney General of Canada (Department of Justice) leave to appeal, it must grant the appeal on the condition that the legal costs of the applicants be paid by the Department.

Apparently it is not only the Ontario same-sex challenge that is being funded by the taxpayers. According to the Montreal Gazette (Sept. 8, 2002), the Court Challenges program has also paid $62,000 of the $180,000 fees incurred by the homosexual applicants for their lawyers in the Quebec court challenge case. A further $8,000 was raised by donations. So far the homosexual applicants have paid only $20,000 from their own pockets with their lawyers writing off the remainder of their fees.

If there is any injustice in this case, it is directed at the Canadian taxpayer, who is experiencing the indignity of being forced to pay and pay and pay for court cases which seek to define marriage as a union of same-sex couples. That is, the definition of marriage as a union of a man and a woman, which is the law in every nation of the world - with the single exception of the Netherlands - and is supported by the beliefs of all the major religions of the world is being challenged by activists at our expense. Where do these homosexual activists find the gall to demand that they be paid in their efforts to destroy the fabric of Canadian society? This is just another example of how they expect society to dance to their discordant tune.

BACK TO TABLE OF CONTENTS