BACK TO TABLE OF CONTENTS

A MESSAGE FROM REAL WOMEN OF CANADA ON SAME-SEX MARRIAGE

Canada is undergoing a revolution in which the Canadian public has been denied any participation.

The revolution will alter the foundation of our society by allowing same-sex couples to enter into legal marriages.

In this endeavour, the Canadian public has been treated as a child - not a very bright child - who has been lied to, manipulated and tricked, in order to convince it that it has no choice but to obediently and blindly accept the decision of a mere handful of individuals to grant same-sex marriages. This handful of individuals include:

  1. Three judges of the Ontario Court of Appeal who gleefully partied with the same-sex litigants at a reception in Toronto on June 26, 2003. (See article "Judges Party with Homosexual Activists.")


  2. Prime Minister Jean Chrétien and the Minister of Justice, Martin Cauchon, who decided together that there would be no appeal of the egregious Ontario court decision on marriage, a decision dutifully rubber-stamped by the Cabinet.


  3. Homosexual MP, Svend Robinson, who worked co-operatively with Justice Minister Cauchon and the Chairman of the House of Commons Justice and Human Rights Committee, Andy Scott (Fredericton, NB), to derail the Justice Committee's report on same-sex marriages.

(See article "The Sordid Story of How the Same-sex Marriage Issue was Manuplated in Canada.")

These few individuals believe they have successfully tricked and manipulated the public into accepting same-sex marriage. But they have not succeeded in doing so.

REAL Women believes that the story as to how the courts and the Liberal government have attempted to manipulate the public should become public. Hence, much of this issue of Reality covers the series of events leading up to Mr. Cauchon's proposed legislation which was announced on July 17, 2003. It is a story that no media outlet in Canada has been prepared to reveal to date.

Remember though that the story has not yet been completed. There are several chapters to follow. These include:

1. An Appeal of Ontario Court of Appeal Decision

Pro-family organizations, including REAL Women, Focus on the Family and Canadian Family Action Coalition (CFAC), as well as major faith-based groups, at enormous expense to their respective organizations, have filed an application for Leave to Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada. We have little confidence in the objectivity of this court, but, nevertheless, it is a window of opportunity that must be applied in order to have our viewpoint part of the public record. (See article "REAL Women of Canada Seeks Leave to Appeal to Supreme Court on Same-sex Marriage," p. ……)

2. Official Opposition in the House of Commons

The official opposition party in the House of Commons, the Alliance Party, is on record as opposing same-sex marriage. It will introduce a motion on the definition of marriage when Parliament resumes, and force a vote on the issue before the Supreme Court reviews the government's same-sex legislation.

3. Religious Leaders Awakening

Religious leaders in Canada have come awake to the peril that is overtaking Canada. They are responding to the same-sex marriage crisis. Not only are the religious leaders (with the exception of the liberal United Church and Unitarians), unhesitatingly participating in the court cases, but they have set about, province by province, city by city and town by town, church by church, to arouse its members to this terrible disaster ahead of us.

These religious leaders know they failed on the abortion issue, and they are determined that they will not fail again. Religious organizations rightly believe that their very existence is at stake in this mighty struggle. Regardless of any soothing words that the Supreme Court of Canada may hand down in its response to the government's Reference to it, religious leaders know that it is only a matter of time before another Supreme Court of Canada will order them to perform same-sex marriages in obedience to "Charter values," i.e. hedonist individualism, which will ultimately push religion off the nation's stage even further into the margins than it already occupies, thanks to the courts.

4. The Public

Last, but certainly not least, the Canadian public still has a voice in this unhappy affair. In this regard, the public opposed to same-sex marriage has some cards to play. These include obviously large numbers, and the fact that there will be a federal election some time after April 2004, when the Electoral Boundaries Readjustment Act will have been completed by adding seven new seats - two in BC, two in Alberta and three more in already voter-heavy Ontario. The 2004 election will probably take place in June/July 2004. This election makes every MP vulnerable, and each has to know beyond a doubt that his/her future Parliamentary career depends upon the "free" vote on the same-sex marriage issue. It will be a recorded vote, so that the MPs' decision will be a matter of public record for all to see.

Several chapters on the issue of same-sex marriage have already been written. However, the final and most important chapters are still ahead,.


BACK TO TABLE OF CONTENTS