BACK TO TABLE OF CONTENTS

REAL WOMEN 2003 RESOLUTIONS

At REAL Women's annual meeting held in Ottawa on April 4th, several very important resolutions were passed, which will form a part of our ongoing work this year.

The Resolutions were as follows:

1. Court Challenges Program

As mentioned elsewhere in this issue, REAL Women and other pro-family organizations are facing an up-hill battle in the Canadian courts against the feminist/homosexual groups whose legal challenges are being funded almost entirely by the taxpayer by way of the federal Heritage Department's grants to the Court Challenges Program.

The one-sided funding policies of the Court Challenges Program, whereby it funds only the feminist and homosexual anti-life and anti-family organizations, have precluded the courts from hearing a balance of views. As a result, those wishing to destroy traditional family values have been given an unprecedented opportunity to achieve this objective.

It is also unconscionable that the Heritage Department is gladly handing over millions of dollars of taxpayers' money to keep the Court Challenges Program operating, even though it has absolutely no control or knowledge as to how the Court Challenges Program is using these funds.

The Resolution

WHEREAS the federal government established as a government agency the Court Challenges Program in 1978 to assist financially disadvantaged groups in assisting them with court challenges on language rights, and extended this program in 1985 to financially assist disadvantaged groups in court challenges dealing with equality rights issues;

AND WHEREAS
in 1994 the Court Challenges Program was incorporated as an independent organization, called the Court Challenges Program of Canada Corporation, which is completely separate from the federal government with its own elected Board of Directors;

AND WHEREAS
the Board of Directors and administrators of the Court Challenges Program of Canada Corporation are in a conflict of interest in that they consist of representatives from special interest organizations, predominately homosexual and feminist, whose organizations receive the major funding provided by the Corporation. This funding policy which discriminates against pro-life and pro-family organizations, as they are denied financial assistance by the Corporation, resulting in their being denied an equal opportunity to appear before the courts;

AND WHEREAS this independent corporation, the Court Challenges Program of Canada Corporation, is financed almost entirely by the federal government through the Department of Heritage which has no control over the distribution of the funds by this independent corporation;

BE IT RESOLVED that the federal government cease to fund the Court Challenges Program of Canada Corporation.

To object to the government funding of the Court Challenges Program, please write to:

The Right Hon. Jean Chrétien, PC, MP
Office of the Prime Minister
Langevin Building
80 Wellington Street
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A2
Fax: 613-941-6900

The Hon. Sheila Copps, PC, MP
Minister of Canadian Heritage
Les Terrasses de la Chaudière, 12th Floor
Hull, Quebec K1A 0M5
Fax: 613-994-1267

The Hon. John Manley, PC, MP
Deputy Prime Minister, Minister of Finance and Minister of Infrastructure
15th Floor, 55 Metcalfe Street
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A3
Fax: 613-943-0938

Your MP
House of Commons
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A6

2. Enforcement of Child Pornography Law

Our police forces, as mentioned in the article, "The Chaos of Child Pornography," (Reality, March/April, 2003, p. 12) are unable to adequately enforce the child pornography laws in Canada for a number of reasons:

  1. lack of a national strategy among federal, provincial, and regional police and justice authorities;
  2. lack of internet training for police forces to track child pornography on the internet and a lack of money to increase staff for child pornography investigations;
  3. court-made problems such as police difficulties in obtaining warrants for searches, and extensive requirements for police to disclose all their evidence to the accused's lawyer, as well as lenient sentences being handed out by the courts to those convicted of possession of child pornography.

The Resolution

WHEREAS child pornography has become very accessible by way of the internet;

AND WHEREAS enforcement of the child pornography law has not been effective due to the lack of a national strategy among federal, provincial, regional and municipal authorities;

AND WHEREAS the courts have taken a lenient approach to sentencing those found guilty of violation of the child pornography law despite the fact that the Criminal Code provides a five year maximum sentence for possessing child pornography, and a ten year maximum sentence for distributing child pornography;

AND WHEREAS the courts have compromised the police forces in Canada in regard to investigations of child pornography due to the requirement that extensive evidence be provided before a search warrant is granted. Further, the requirement of time-intensive and costly full disclosure to the defence lawyers of all evidence seized in an investigation - which obligates the police to categorize and photocopy all images and photographs seized in an investigation, instead of requiring only samples of such evidence - creates further difficulties for the police force;

BE IT RESOLVED that a national strategy for the enforcement of child pornography be developed, and that the legal impediments to obtaining search warrants by the police and the extensive disclosure rules be amended to facilitate the prosecution of child pornography cases; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that sentencing guidelines be provided to the judges so that stricter sentences be handed down in child pornography cases; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that financial resources be provided for more manpower and internet training for Canadian police forces in order to enable them to properly carry out their responsibilities in enforcing the child pornography law in Canada.

Please write to the following to insist that the child pornography law be properly enforced:

The Hon. Martin Cauchon, PC, MP
Minister of Justice
East Memorial Building, 4th Floor
284 Wellington Street
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0H8
Fax: 613-990-7255

Attorney General of your province
c/o Provincial Legislature

Your MP
House of Commons
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0A6

3. Marijuana Use Must Remain A Criminal Offence

The Liberal government appears intent on decriminalizing marijuana, despite the fact that more and more evidence indicates that it is extremely hazardous to health.

In the last year (2002) alone, there were five different studies published in the medical literature indicating the harmful effects of marijuana. Such effects include the increase in schizophrenia and depression by marijuana users, especially adults and girls; marijuana becoming a "gateway" drug to other illicit drugs; and the increase of both dependency, and respiratory diseases, including lung cancer, caused by marijuana use.

Moreover, for Canada to decriminalize marijuana means that it will be contravening numerous UN conventions which Canada has ratified, agreeing to keep the use of marijuana as a criminal offence.

Finally, the US has notified Canada that decriminalizing marijuana will lead to intense problems at the border between Canada and the US. John Walters, the Director of the US National Drug Control Policy in the White House, has officially notified Canada that the US will restrict the movement of goods from Canada into the US if we decriminalize marijuana. According to the UN's drug monitoring agency, the Narcotics Control Board (NCB), most of Canada's highly toxic marijuana (up to 30% THC, higher than is now being produced, for example, in Burma, Afghanistan or Jamaica, etc.) is being shipped from Canada to the US. Should marijuana be decriminalized, this large movement of marijuana across the US border will only increase, due to the increased production and lack of police surveillance here.

It is noted, due to the unprecedented amount of marijuana pouring over the border into the US, (a tenfold increase between 1998 - 2000), that the US State Department considered placing Canada on its narcotics black list alongside Burma and Afghanistan. It was only diplomatic pressure from Ottawa that prevented this from occurring.

The Resolution

WHEREAS scientific evidence indicates that marijuana use is hazardous to health and is addictive;

AND WHEREAS an evaluation of the relevant research on the medical use of marijuana does not support marijuana as a prescribable medicine;

AND WHEREAS Minister of Justice Martin Cauchon has announced his intention to decriminalize marijuana under the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act (CDSA), so as to render its use a minor offence similar to that of receiving a traffic ticket;

AND WHEREAS the law serves as a guideline to the conscience so that to many, that which is legal is acceptable, which results in the wider use of marijuana should it be decriminalized;

BE IT RESOLVED that marijuana use not be decriminalized and that it remain a major offence under the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that deterrent legislation against marijuana use be accompanied by well-funded education programs, treatment centres, and the effective enforcement of the law.

Please write to:

Hon. Martin Cauchon, PC, MP
Minister of Justice
East Memorial Building, 4th Floor
284 Wellington Street
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0H8
Fax: 613-990-7255

The Hon. Anne McLellan, PC, MP
Minister of Health
0916A Brooke Claxton Building, 16th Floor
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0K9
Fax: 613-952-1154

Your MP
House of Commons
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0A6

4. Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder

There are now 300,000 children in Canada suffering from Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder caused by their mothers' abuse of alcohol during pregnancy. Children must not endure the physical and mental deformities and emotional and psychological problems throughout their lives because of their mothers' irresponsibility during pregnancy. As noted in the article, "The Unborn Child Begins a Comeback" (Reality, Mar./Apr., 2003, p. 18), it is time that legislation be passed to protect such children from this abuse during pregnancy. In the meantime, since each day brings many such tragedies, health warning labels must immediately be placed on containers of alcoholic beverages and all alcohol advertising to warn the consumer of the grave problems resulting from alcohol use during pregnancy.

The Resolution

WHEREAS research indicates that at least 1 in 100 Canadians are living with permanent learning and behaviour problems resulting from alcohol abuse by the mother during pregnancy;

AND WHEREAS the majority of children born with Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder are not diagnosed with this disorder which leads to misunderstandings about their behaviour;

AND WHEREAS the 300,000 individuals now living with Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder are at high risk of school drop-out, trouble with the law, addiction to alcohol and drugs, unemployment, poverty, homelessness and mental illness;

AND WHEREAS the costs to the taxpayer during the life of a child born with Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder is estimated to be at least $2 million;

BE IT RESOLVED that women in Canada, and their partners be warned of the dangers to their unborn child due to alcohol consumed during pregnancy;

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the federal government act on Motion M-155, proposed by NDP MP Judy Wasylycia-Leis (Winnipeg North Centre), and seconded by Liberal MP Paul Szabo (Mississauga South), which was passed in the House of Commons on April 23, 2001, which provides that the Government require health warning labels on the containers of alcoholic beverages to caution expectant mothers and others of the risks associated with alcohol consumption during pregnancy; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that all alcohol advertising, in print, radio or television be required to warn the consumer that alcohol in pregnancy may cause permanent mental and physical disabilities, and that a safe threshold for alcohol use in pregnancy has not been established. and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that comprehensive Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder instruction be included in all medical and health curriculums in Canada.

Please write to:

The Hon. Anne McLellan, PC, MP
Minister of Health
0916A Brooke Claxton Building, 16th Floor
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0K9
Fax: 613-952-1154

Your MP
House of Commons
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0A6

BACK TO TABLE OF CONTENTS