|
BACK TO TABLE OF CONTENTS
FEMALE LIBERAL MPS WHINING OVER THEIR NOMINATIONS
Prime Minister Martin announced in November
2003 that he wanted open nominations for Liberal candidates
and that, as a result, there would be no appointed or favoured
candidates in the nomination process. Even incumbents will
not be protected. In short, in the forthcoming federal election,
all the candidates are expected to fight for their nominations.
However, no sooner had Mr. Martin made the
announcement than a collective whine arose from the feminist
women Liberal MPs, who demanded that their own nominations
be considered a special case and given protection. (There
are 40 female MPs, i.e. 23%, in the Liberal caucus.) In other
words, MPs, many of whom are feminists, who are supposed to
support "equality" between men and women, are seeking
something quite different - special treatment because they
are women. Female Liberal MPs, such as Sophia Leung (Vancouver
Kingsway), Hedy Fry (Vancouver Centre), Marlene Catterall
(Ottawa West - Nepean) Jean Augustine (Etobicoke-Lakeshore,
whose own nomination was personally handed to her by Mr. Chrétien),
and Anita Neville (Winnipeg South Centre) all complain that
"aggressive challenges" are being made to their
riding nominations by "malevolent" males. What hapless
victims these women candidates claim to be in light of this
open nomination process! According to the Ottawa Citizen,
December 6, 2003, Anita Neville, leader of the Liberal Women's
Caucus, pronounced herself "furious" that "a
lot of cowboys" in the party are ganging up on the female
MPs as the men seem to think they have a better chance than
the women.
The loudest whine of all has came from former
Heritage Minister, Sheila Copps (Hamilton East) who claims
that she and other female MPs are being targeted to lose their
nominations. Under redistribution, Ms. Copps's riding has
been redrawn to be joined with the riding of Tony Valeri,
a Martin loyalist and now Minister of Transport, to form the
new riding of Hamilton-East-Stoney Creek. The two MPs are
now in a head to head battle over the nomination for this
new riding. Ms. Copps claims that this is all part of a deliberate
plan by Mr. Martin against female MPs who failed to support
him in the Liberal leadership race. She claims that it is
no coincidence that a majority of ridings where there is a
nomination fight are held by women. In 1986, Ms. Copps wrote
her autobiography, Nobody's Baby, in which she discussed her
strong independent nature and belief in feminist principles.
But she has now shown herself to be a "baby" all
right - a big cry-baby, who doesn't want to fight for her
riding, but prefers to play the gender card in a bid to get
the nomination handed to her on a platter.
However, Mr. Martin brought these squeals
of female anguish on himself when he told the Liberal women's
caucus at the Liberal Convention in Toronto in November 2003,
that he wanted 52% of his caucus to be composed of women.
This is interesting because Parliamentarians are not elected
to represent people of the same age, sex or race as themselves.
MPs are selected to speak on behalf of a community. There
are many qualified women who would make excellent Parliamentarians,
but they must be subject to the same rules as everyone else,
and this includes showing the capacity and will to win nominations.
The public does not vote according to gender
and anatomy, but rather, votes for the platform and effectiveness
of each candidate. Candidates, such as Sheila Copps, should
be reminded of that.
BACK TO TABLE OF CONTENTS
|