BACK TO TABLE OF CONTENTS

CANADIAN CHILDREN TARGETED ON THE INTERNET

Through the Internet, a growing number of men in foreign countries are now targeting Canadian children for pornography and sex purposes. This cross-border activity into Canada has been enhanced by two factors: (1) Canada's age of consent for sex is set at only 14 years, and is lower than most other western nations, and (2) Canada is one of the world's most wired countries: there are more than 10 million Internet users in Canada.

What is truly alarming is that, according to statistics provided by Microsoft Canada, 99% of children in Canada have access to the Internet and 25% have been approached by a stranger online. More shocking is that 15% have actually gone out to meet an Internet stranger without their parents knowing. Some have never returned home

In short, the Internet has become a massive vehicle that criminals use to hire and abuse Canadian children and to distribute illegal material.

According to Canadian police, paedophiles searching for prepubescent sex partners with chat software share common techniques that law enforcement officials refer to as "grooming" the child. Predators often target neglected, needy children, many from broken homes, and use tactics, such as offering gifts or money, expressing affection, paying attention to and exploiting things that are bothering the child, or offering some sort of help to the child. As they continue to "chat" on the Internet, predators pick up more and more information about the child and his or her location. Some predators dedicate years to "grooming" just one child.

One-third of child molesters were reportedly abused as children themselves, and there is a connection between the age they were molested and the age of the victims they seek. Other paedophiles target children because they are socially unsuccessful with adults; they may molest a young girl because she is less threatening than a woman. (Girls are targeted far more frequently than boys on the Internet.)

Solutions to Preventing Luring Children on the Internet

  1. Raising the Age of Consent

    It is clear that Canada must raise the age of consent from 14 years to at least 16 years of age, but preferably to 18 years of age. This is crucial to deter international paedophiles. Raising the age of consent to 18 years of age is not unreasonable since adolescents cannot purchase cigarettes or alcohol until they are at least 18 years of age. Moreover, they are given special protection under the criminal justice system until 18 years of age. So why are they being permitted to consent to sexual activity at an earlier age? Pregnancy, sexually transmitted diseases, including AIDS, and sexual, physical and emotional abuse caused by their adult sexual partners will haunt these children for the rest of their lives.

    Liberals Refusal to Raise Age of Consent

    On April 23, 2002, the Alliance Party brought a motion before the House of Commons to raise the age of consent to 16 years of age. This was soundly defeated by the Liberals under the direction of the former Justice Minister, Martin Cauchon. The reasons given for opposing this motion by the Liberals was that adolescents should not be restricted regarding expressing themselves sexually. This objection makes no sense, especially since the Criminal Code provides in S.150.1(2) that no charges may be laid if the accused is fewer than two years older than the complainant. Also, the Liberals claimed that the age of consent was a complex matter that required further study and consultation. This, too, makes no sense since the provincial and federal Attorneys General have discussed this issue at length at their annual federal/provincial meetings in October 1998 and December 1999, and concluded that the age of consent must be raised to 16 years.

    Why then the reluctance on the part of the Liberal government to raise the age of consent? A clue to its reluctance might be in the fact that several homosexual organizations have been adamantly opposed to raising the age of consent on the grounds that such a move would severely affect gay and lesbian youth. They claim, for example, that it would give "homophobic parents an extra weapon to use against their children", and that it would motivate school boards and public health departments to change their sexual health curricula and other outreach to be less available to young people (Xtra, March 23, 2000). It appears that Mr. Cauchon responded favourably to these small, self-interested, special interest groups even though he and his government had a grave duty to protect vulnerable children. His failure to do so in order to appease homosexual lobbyists is playing politics with the lives of children.


  2. Increase Funding for Manpower and Police Training

    Canadian police departments do not have the manpower to effectively prevent the Internet being used to lure children. Searching hard drives for evidence is a laborious, time-consuming task. For this, police also need proper forensic training. It takes up to five years to acquire the knowledge to use the computer as a crime scene. Further, it takes at least 3 to 10 days to analyze a computer suspected of being used for pornographic purposes. One such computer can yield thousands of pages of information that must be removed for purposes of analysis. This is not an easy undertaking.

    Since it is children that the police force is trying to protect, its efforts in this regard should be a priority. It is absolutely crucial that funding be provided for police departments across the country to undertake this work, armed with the necessary skills and training.


  3. Vigilance of Parents

    According to Staff Sgt. McKay of the Ottawa police force, (Ottawa Citizen, May 15, 2004), "nobody on the high-tech crimes team will ever leave their kids with a male babysitter" and "they don't allow sleepovers because [the paedophile] could be your friend, your cousin, your uncle …". Many paedophiles also gravitate to positions where they have contact and authority over children. That is why some paedophiles become Scout leaders and teachers. Parents should be ever alert to this unpleasant reality.

    Too many parents, however, are not aware of, or do not understand, the scope or severity of the dangers their children face online. According to police, there are a few simple steps for parents to take to reduce the dangers. The most important thing is to set up computers in common areas of the home, where the children can't hide out chatting with a stranger on the Internet. (You wouldn't allow your child to talk to a stranger on the phone from a closet.) Parents must also monitor the time their child spends on the computer, and what their children are doing on it. It is the parents' responsibility to do so.

For children who have unlimited, unsupervised access to the Internet, it is a grim and dangerous world out there. Something has to be done.

BACK TO TABLE OF CONTENTS