BACK TO TABLE OF CONTENTS

CANADA'S ROLE AT THE UNITED NATIONS

By Ginger Malacko
UN representative for REAL Women of Canada

For most people, the United Nations conjures up visions of global cooperation, good will, and the utmost respect for all persons. I'm sure that at one time this was true. But we know from experience that times have changed, and that the UN has become an instrument for radical social engineering. At one time, Canada actually lived up to its reputation of being a world leader in peacekeeping and mediation, but again…times have changed.

In recent years, emboldened by the increasing power of the Liberal juggernaut in Ottawa, the Canadian delegations within the UN have decided to shed their noble diplomatic image in order to leap into the fray and get their hands dirty. Much of the extreme anti-family, anti-life language debated in the UN originates from Canada. Whether it's abortion, euthanasia, or sexual orientation, you can be sure that Canada has had a hand in it. So who are these delegates and whom do they answer to? Good question. They are certainly not average citizens and they are certainly not accountable to them.

Canada's UN representatives are the leftist elite - chosen by the government - not to represent Canada, but to represent the personal views and political agenda of the Prime Minister and the Minister of Foreign Affairs and his bureaucrats.

In March of this year, I attended the UN Commission on the Status of Women held in New York. Having attended many such UN meetings, I fully expected to be disenchanted with the Canadian delegation. What I witnessed was a prime example of the Liberal government's policy at work; a mode of operation all Canadians should be concerned with, regardless of the political ideology to which they subscribe.

For instance, Prime Minister Paul Martin promised Canada that our relations with the United States would be a top priority of this government. This is hard to believe when the Canadian delegates used obscenities to describe the US delegates during some negotiation meetings at the UN. It was also embarrassing to watch the Canadian delegates laughing and smirking when the US made socially conservative proposals. And it was frightening to witness the Canadian delegation participating in 'private' strategy meetings in which their main objective was to block and sabotage the US. As a resident of Alberta, which is a province that depends heavily on commerce with the US, I am particularly offended by this disrespect and disregard for Canada/US relations, sometimes for no better reason than 'payback' for American proposals, procedures, and laws not favoured by the far left.

Liberal arrogance doesn't stop there. They have the same disrespect and disregard for Canadian law as well. For example, at this recent Commission on the Status of Women meeting, the US put forward a groundbreaking resolution on Trafficking of Women and Girls that focused very specifically on the role of prostitution. While prostitution is technically legal in Canada, it has not been 'decriminalized', which means that anyone caught soliciting, communicating, or living off the avails of prostitution is punished according to Canadian law. The Canadian delegation however, fought hard for the removal of any language that could be interpreted as criminalizing prostitution, which was not in line with our current laws. It appears to be the policy of this Liberal government and Foreign Affairs to negotiate on the basis of what they would like Canadian law to become, not on what Canadian law actually is. The Canadian delegation, together with other nations that have already decriminalized prostitution, punched so many holes in the carefully drafted American resolution against prostitution and trafficking in women, that the document became meaningless.

A waste of both time and money? You bet! But that is, after all, what the Liberal government excels at. It is common for the delegations of wealthier nations to become quite large in number, but Canada has been excessive in its appointments. Fifty-two delegates were sent to the Commission on the Status of Women at taxpayers' expense, which leaves me wondering: how many delegates does it take to screw up a US resolution?

And what was the Canadian delegation doing that would make fifty-two people necessary when most countries get by with four or five? Your guess is as good as mine. I suppose that the 23 non-governmental (NGO) delegates, the 29 government officials, and 6 Members of Parliament on the delegation kept busy somehow, despite the fact that only a dozen were actually seen at work over the course of the two-week Commission meetings. I imagine the six Members of Parliament enjoyed the sights of New York City, while they thanked their lucky stars to be in Paul Martin's good graces.

According to the Globe and Mail (March 19, 2005) Toronto Liberal MP Sarmite Bulte, (Parkdale - High Park), who was a member of the Canadian delegation, was seen shopping on Fifth Avenue during the session. Since her airfare, hotel, meals, taxis etc. were all paid for by the Canadian taxpayer on this excursion, she probably felt she could afford to shop on New York's most exclusive and expensive street.

If the Canadian delegation is made up of leftist elitists and government vacationers, how are the concerns and opinions of regular Canadians ever going to be represented in the United Nations? Exactly. They are not meant to be. The arena of international politics is carefully hidden from the view of the average Canadian. Declarations are adopted and treaties are ratified, and the media reports are ambiguous and biased at best. And where is Parliament in all this mess? Exactly where the Prime Minister likes it…out of the picture. We must rely on the Prime Minister to decide what is best for all Canadians, which is undeniable evidence of the desperate need for reform in this country.

Canada is a nation of peacekeepers. It is a country that values tradition and freedom. We are a people who are concerned with contributing to the global community. We must make sure our 'representatives' reflect these qualities, instead of the pettiness, wastefulness, self-righteousness, and unaccountability they have consistently shown for the past three decades. What all Canadians should realize and remember is that the function of our delegation is a reflection of the government we elected. As bleak as the situation appears in the United Nations, it is only a symptom of far greater problems at home.

BACK TO TABLE OF CONTENTS