|
BACK TO TABLE OF CONTENTS
THE NDP HAS TROUBLES
Life isn't always fair. Just ask federal NDP
leader, Jack Layton. He has relentlessly run up and down the
country at break-neck speed since he became party leader in
2003, speaking before every available open microphone attempting
to gain credibility, both for himself and his party. Of course,
it doesn't help that Mr. Layton often makes inane comments,
such as "marijuana [is] 'a wonderful drug" and that
he would go further than simply decriminalizing cannabis,
but would "legalize it with provisions for home use,
use in cafes, and personal grow-ops". Further, he stated
that "Canadians should be able to smoke pot without getting
bothered by the law." If he follows his own advice, perhaps
that might explain some of his more foolish comments. In fact,
Mr. Layton pops up so frequently in the media on this and
other issues, that he resembles a child's jack-in-the-box!
However, Mr. "jack-in-the-box" Layton
is facing some serious problems. His party propped up the
Liberal government last spring by insisting that the 2005
federal budget be expanded by $4.6 billion by the addition
of NDP priorities, such as funding for the environment and
municipalities. In October, Mr. Layton dourly warned the Liberals
that unless Prime Minister Martin took action to protect medicare,
his party will stop supporting them. This would result in
a Christmas election. Thus, when the Gomery Report was released
in early November, Mr. Layton, announced he would no longer
prop up the Liberals. At the time of writing this article
it is not known whether the NDP is merely using this refusal
as a negotiating tactic to wrestle more goodies from the Liberals,
or whether Mr. Layton is trying to actually distance his party
from the Liberals because his party is disappearing into the
Liberal's shadow by continuing to support them.
Despite all Mr. Layton's efforts to raise
his party's profile, it appears that public support for his
party has been more or less anchored at approximately 18%
of the popular vote or about 19 seats. According to a Decima
poll, conducted on October 13 to 17, 2005, the Liberal lead
over the Conservatives had shrunk to 5%. However, a Strategic
Counsel Poll for The Globe and Mail and CTV news conducted
in the first week of November gave the Conservatives 31%,
the Liberals 28% and the NDP zoomed up to 20% of the popular
vote. An Ipsos-Reid poll conducted at the same time gave the
Liberals 31% and the Conservatives 30% and the NDP 19%.
The Strategic Counsel polling company owned
by pollster Allan Gregg, however, never seems to fail to come
up with a poll in favour of the Liberal Party whenever it
needs one. Thus, not surprisingly, on November 3rd and 4th
a new Strategic Counsel poll, lo and behold, showed the Liberals
had snapped back to 35% of the popular vote, the Conservatives
at 28% and the NDP at a lowly 11%. There! That should stop
the nasty opposition parties from calling for a non-confidence
vote!
The difficulty is that polls are polls and
change by the minute. They are not very reliable since much
depends on the question asked and also on whether the polling
is actually as "random" as it is supposed to be.
However, all of the polls do indicate one unchanging fact
- low numbers for the NDP. This indicates that the NDP would
be fortunate to retain the number of seats it now holds in
Parliament.
The troubles being experienced by the NDP
today are numerous. They include:
1. Svend Robinson
Former NDP homosexual MP Svend Robinson
plans to run in the next election in Vancouver Centre against
incumbent Liberal Hedy Fry (she of the burning crosses in
Prince George, "as we speak").
There is a good chance Mr. Robinson may
defeat Ms Fry, and this spells trouble for the NDP caucus.
Mr. Robinson is a polarizing force and his
presence will push the NDP out of the mainstream, where
it has been desperately trying to relocate itself in the
eyes of the general public.
Mr. Robinson, who was an NDP MP between
1979 and 2004, resigned his seat because he stole a $64,000.00
diamond ring intended for his boyfriend. Robinson claimed
the theft was due to his suffering from bipolar disorder
(manic depression), but admits that he takes no medication
for his condition. Mr. Robinson received only a conditional
sentence for his offence, along with 100 hours of community
service. That is, he received neither jail time nor a criminal
record.
It is astonishing that Mr. Robinson claims
that his stealing of the ring was caused by his mental disorder,
but claims that his disorder won't affect his judgment as
an MP.
Party leader Layton accepted Mr. Robinson's
decision to resign in April after the ring episode. However,
Mr. Layton showed a remarkable lack of judgment and abuse
of power in July, when he sent Mr. Robinson along with his
boyfriend Max Rivéron to Edinburgh at taxpayers expense,
to attend a meeting of the Parliamentary Assembly of the
Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe. This
was a free junket given to Mr. Robinson by the NDP for which
Mr. Robinson was not entitled, since he had ceased to be
an MP and could no longer represent Canada.
Mr. Robinson is not well liked within his
own caucus because he is regarded as a brash, aggressive
loner and a publicity hound. Some of Mr. Robinson's bizarre
behaviour was listed in REALity, January / February 2004,
p.4. These include being jailed for 14 days in 1994 for
contempt of court, booing US President, Ronald Reagan in
1997 when he addressed the Canadian Parliament, enthusiastically
endorsing, in 2002, Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat, and
Iraq's Saddam Hussein. In 2001, he posed naked on the Internet
in a fund-raising appeal on behalf of a conservationist
group. The list of his eccentricities goes on and on, indicating
both his lack of judgment and his insatiable desire for
publicity. Consequently, the election of Mr. Robinson as
an MP can only create problems for the NDP and its credibility
with the Canadian public.
2. Loss of Nomination by NDP MP Bev Desjarlais
(Churchill)
In October, NDP leader, Jack Layton, supported
a 24-year old recent university graduate, daughter of a
Manitoba cabinet minister, for the Churchill, Manitoba riding
nomination against NDP incumbent, Bev Desjarlais. The latter
had voted against same-sex marriage (Bill C-38) in June,
despite Mr. Layton ordering his caucus to vote for the bill,
with no exceptions. Immediately after the vote on same-sex
marriage, Ms Desjarlais was punished by Mr. Layton by being
relieved of her critic duties, and she has now been removed
from her position as a candidate for the party in the forthcoming
election. However, Ms Desjarlais remains unrepentant, stating
that, "Discipline within caucus is a far lesser worry
for me than my living with myself over something I believe
quite strongly about." As a result of her loss of the
nomination, Ms Desjarlais has now resigned from the NDP
caucus, and is sitting as an independent in the House of
Commons. This has reduced the NDP there to only 18 members.
Ms Desjarlais plans to run as an independent in the next
election. This means that there will certainly be a split
vote on the left in her riding and, as a result, it is unlikely
that the NDP will retain that seat.
3. Growing Conservative Religious Political
Activism
The NDP is apparently being damaged by growing
conservative religious political activism. Several Catholic
NDP MPs received varying degrees of censure from their local
churches for voting for the same-sex marriage legislation.
As a result, NDP caucus members are trying to create some
wiggle room for themselves by tabling a motion to create
a Faith and Social Justice Caucus within the party to provide
them with some cover when campaigning against what they
refer to as our "right-wing brethren in the pews."
They believe that the party must be made more inviting to
religious "progressives" of all faiths, i.e. make
room for a faith perspective within the party. As stated
by NDP riding association president, Christopher Duncanson-Hines,
for the Carlton-Mississippi Mills riding in Ontario, "Faith
is becoming more important as an issue in public life, and
I don't think we can ignore what's going on."
The faith motion is supported by MP Tony
Martin (Sault Ste. Marie), who was relieved of all official
duties in his local Catholic Church for backing the same-sex
marriage bill. The motion for the "faith" caucus
within the NDP was also supported by Catholic MP Charlie
Angus (Timmins - James Bay) who was refused communion by
his local parish priest for supporting the same-sex marriage
bill. Deputy party leader Bill Blaikie, a United Church
minister (Elmwood-Transcona, Manitoba), Bill Siksay (Burnaby-Douglas)
and Quebecois party activist Pierre Ducasse also backed
the motion to create the caucus. The motion to establish
the "Faith" caucus will be debated at the NDP's
next convention. The purpose of this proposed caucus, however,
is not to re-open the party's debate around abortion, capital
punishment, and same-sex marriage, etc., but rather to open
up the social democratic spiritual floodgates to allow the
party to expand its base and incorporate new immigrants
with a religious background. MP Tony Martin is quoted as
saying, "We ignore the growing conservative religious
political activism at our peril!"
Whether the creation of the faith caucus
will do the trick for the NDP, to offset the growing dynamic
of conservative religious political activism, is debatable
in view of the party's entrenched anti-life, anti-family
policies, which are contrary to the views of the world's
mainstream faiths.
BACK TO TABLE OF CONTENTS
|