|
BACK TO TABLE OF CONTENTS
PRESIDENT'S MESSAGE
The other day my husband and son were checking
out the newspaper to find out what movies were showing in
town, but they could not find anything which they would wish
to see. They usually enjoy a good action picture, and they
are certainly not prudes, but the fare that was offered was
so obscene or violent, or so favourable to the homosexual
lifestyle, that they decided instead to stay home and watch
television. This was not much better, but at least there were
several unobjectionable movies and programs on the menu.
As noted film critic Michael Medved comments
in Hollywood vs. America, "Hollywood no longer
reflects - or even respects the values of most American families.
On many of the important issues in contemporary life, popular
entertainment seems to go out of its way to challenge conventional
notions of decency."
There certainly is a dearth of decent family-oriented
movies today, and it is a puzzle why they are produced. Certainly
it is not the profit factor, because movies with controversial
themes do not earn nearly as much revenue as many of the family-friendly
films. For example, as one movie writer conceded, as of February,
2006 the five films nominated for major Academy Awards collectively
accounted for little more than 200 million dollars, "barely
a ripple next to Hollywood's 2005 domestic revenues of $8.95
billion
" The real moneymakers in 2005 were movies
such as Star Wars: Episode II - Revenge of the Sith, and
The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe.
The traditional family stands for traditional
values which fly in the face of the "liberal" Hollywood
endorsement of themes which include gratuitous violence, obscenity,
pornography, sexual deviation, and outright animosity toward
mainstream religious values. Consider, for example, three
of the top Academy Award nominees. The highly-touted Brokeback
Mountain, which I understand is beautifully filmed, is
still basically the story of two homosexual "lovers"
whose actions are destructive to themselves and their families.
Capote is the story of a homosexual writer who is willing
to lie and cheat for the sake of his "art". Transamerica
is the story of a transsexual. It was a surprise to many that
Brokeback Mountain did not win awards as expected;
perhaps the homosexual agenda was simply pushed too hard.
Television is no better. No longer is controversial
material limited to late-night viewing. Even in the middle
of the day one must be circumspect when channel surfing, especially
when children are present, because there is so much graphic
sexual content.
One of the "justifications" for
outrageous programming and movies is that the producers are
willing to take risks in order to protect "artistic integrity".
Somehow I doubt this is the real reason. It is far more likely
that many of those persons who are in control of the entertainment
industry have an agenda to change society in order to reflect
their own jaded tastes. Unfortunately, they have to a great
extent succeeded.
If you are like me, objectionable movies and
television shows are of little account personally, because
I simply do not bother to view them. That is fine for those
of us who have already developed positive moral values, but
what about our young people? They are growing up inundated
with visual messages that promote unhealthy sexuality and
violence, and they cannot help but be affected.
What can we do to counter this evil? First
of all, in an age-appropriate manner, we should have open
and honest discussions with our children. There is a lot of
garbage out there, and our young people cannot avoid being
exposed to it. Help them to recognize when they are being
manipulated by the movie or television media. Provide them
with solid values, and with well-reasoned arguments to support
their beliefs, so that they can stand up for themselves when
challenged. So often, when youngsters leave home for college
or university, they are ill-prepared to defend the Judaeo-Christian
values with which they were raised.
REAL Women of Canada always urges its members
to take an active role, if at all possible, to promote traditional
values. One way to help counter the anti-family agenda, for
example, is by contacting the sponsors of offensive television
programs. Recently two U.S. television programs which were
downright blasphemous were cancelled, thanks to a powerful
letter-writing campaign by members of the public. We can also
relay our concerns to the owners of theatre chains. It was
due to public pressure that the Famous Players Theatres removed
an advertisement promoting same-sex marriage. If enough people
protest against objectionable films (and I do not mean by
picketing - that seems only to provide unwarranted publicity),
then eventually the message might have an effect.
And of course we must continue to pray that
there will be a change of heart on the part of those who are
presently in control of the entertainment industry.
BACK TO TABLE OF CONTENTS
|