July/August 2009

BACK TO TABLE OF CONTENTS

Although she is young in years, after having been involved in various UN conferences and meetings for the past ten years, Ginger Malacko is an old hand at observing the duplicity occurring at the United Nations.   She warned that the information reaching the public through such agencies as the media and universities does not reflect the truth.

Originally, the UN was a forum for mediation, the promotion of peace, and was intended to help eliminate terrible diseases and poverty.  It has failed. As more countries joined the UN, the standards for membership diminished.  Only about 30 percent of UN nations today are considered to be free, and many countries do not even want peace.

Since the original mandate of the UN has failed, it has become instead the champion of “human rights”, setting a standard for all countries, regardless of differences or needs. 

Entitlements are not human rights and to a great extent it is entitlements, not human rights, that the UN promotes.  The UN claims that entitlements are human rights, and that, for example, everyone has the “right” to abortion and sexual pleasure.  If we have a “right” to sexual activity, how would that change our laws on pornography, education, prostitution, etc.?
 
The UN Is A Horrible Place, Doing Horrible Things

There is a huge bureaucracy at work at the UN to promote the emergence of the UN as the moral authority for the entire world: in other words, a global government.  Many UN workers are ideologically driven.  Ginger noted that she had seen a whole “underground city” in the New York headquarters, where numerous rooms and chambers were filled with people publishing documents to re-educate the world on human rights.  The UN is a horrible place doing horrible things.

There are two things for which we would probably give our lives:  family and faith.  Those of us who are devoted to the family will not let the UN dictate to us.  So the UN has now found a way to undermine the family – through promotion of physical addiction, particularly sexual addiction, which would change the way people see the world.  The UN wishes to promote sex as a human right so we will look at the world differently and allow the UN to dictate to us.
 
On the issue of abortion, clever methods are used to promote worldwide abortion rights.  The word “abortion”, however, is never used at the UN.  There have been incremental changes in the language over the years.  The term “reproductive health”, which is a euphemism for abortion, has become “sexual and reproductive health”, and “sex education” has become “sexuality education”, which encompasses more than just information about one’s body.  These terms are used over and over in UN documents.
   
Unfortunately, many countries do not have expertise in the UN’s official languages and must rely on interpretation by others.  Some countries also rely on foreign aid and are afraid to protest against the wishes of countries which provide such aid.  There are cases also where a country’s delegate, under UN influence, has acted in defiance of the country’s actual policy position on an issue under discussion at the UN. 

There are also UN monitoring committees to review each country’s compliance with UN treaties.  These Committees berate a country for its failure to provide feminist/homosexual/abortion legislation, even though the treaties do not include such provisions. 
 
The Battle Is On Our Doorstep

Ginger said that we must fight for Canada and keep the UN out of our government, our communities and our homes.  We must learn about genuine human rights, and become aware of how the UN is messing with our country.
 

BACK TO TABLE OF CONTENTS